One Veil Fits All
December 23rd, 2006I have a problem with Brendan O’Neill’s piece “Veiled Meanings” in Comment is Free (hijab flutter to Islamophobia Watch). Yet again, Muslim women and their experiences are essentialised in a static, frozen stereotype imposed by a non-Muslim, white male, although O’Neill is kind enough to give us two frozen, static stereotypes: all women wearing veils in the Muslim world have it imposed on them by autocratic dictators who wish to de-personalise women, and all women wearing veils in the West are doing so as a signal of counter-culture identity.
In reality there are many veils. Many women wear many different types of veils for many different reasons, even during many different times in their lives. When I was studying in Sana`a Yemen, the women who all wore face-veils (some including covering the eyes) were extremely personable. A veiled woman would recognise, stop and chat with another veiled female friend on her way to the internet cafe; a veiled woman would voraciously haggle with a man selling qat to make sure she got the best price; two veiled women would stroll down the street, arms linked, chatting and gossipping away.
In Indonesia and Malaysia, many millions of women wear veils - usually beautiful pastels or florals with their traditional dress, or even jeans and skirts - but it is laughable to compare them to the Goths of the West: they’re not counter-culture they ARE the culture.
In the Western world, there has been an increase in the number of women wearing hijab, whether through increased migration or increased affiliation with Muslim identity, and I am sure there are some who would wear it as a badge of rebellion. But like any other phenomenon to do with human psychology, there are a whole realm of motivations ranging from the spiritual to the profane.
What about one of my fellow Melbourne sisters who has taken her Islamic piety so seriously that not only does she fully veil, but she prefers not to enter the public realm, but has chosen a life of seclusion not unlike a cloistered Catholic nun. How can she be wearing the veil to scream ‘look at me’ when she chooses to rarely leave her seclusion?
Surely, if it were about counter-culture and identity politics then we would not see a proliferation of hijabs, but rather a proliferation of Afghan burqas as they are surely more of a rebellious mark than a little Tie-Shop silk number. In reality, a very miniscule percentage of women wear clothes that draw such obvious attention to themselves, and those who do tend to prefer more secluded lives, and to avoid mixing with members of the opposite sex.
I wonder if O’Neill peeks into Muslim women’s bedrooms at dawn to see them sleepily put on their veils to pray the first prayer of the day. Are they screaming rebellion at God?
Like any commentator who does not have an appreciation of the religious nature of the act of veiling, they completely miss the spectrum of spiritual connotations that acts of devotion contain. Veiling is a sign of religiosity as much as it is about identity, and I would suggest that leaves some non-religious and non-Muslim commentators feeling a bit uncomfortable.
Join the
this year) is starting up a publishing company looking to translate and publish Islamic texts. (Yes my mouth started watering too.) He is canvassing opinions on what are the most important source texts, and I feel very unqualified to answer him. So I thought I’d post his questions here, and see what you my dear readers think:
A Melburnian Muslim convert blogs religion, academia and life in general.









