Golden Compass review

Rodney Olsen has a post up about the Golden Compass on his blog, which reminds me Abu Yasmin and I went and saw it last week.  The first I knew of it, was reading a Christian blog in the States ranting about it being worse than Harry Potter (or sentiments to that effect).  Abu Yasmin and I were not sure if we would see it, only because it didn’t do well at the box-office in the US and Kidman’s performance was said to be rather stilted.  But with not much on offer at the cinema for our highly treasured and extremely rare chance to go to the movies by ourselves, the Golden Compass it was.

The premise was interesting enough, an alternate Earth in which there were groups of sentient beings: humans whose souls accompanied them outside their bodies in the form of animals called daemons, witches who flew around on broomsticks, and bears who could talk and wore armour.  There is an authoritarian evil hierarchy ruining everyone’s lives (in the movie called the Magisterium but apparently in the book it’s the Church, leaving quite a few Christian critics with their knickers rather understandably in knots) and the main character is a precocious girl called Lyra who seems to be the second-coming for all the free-thinking scientists who are trying desperately to keep truth alive.  I’m not going to say much more than that, in case you do want to see the movie. 

It left me flat, however.  Especially the ending, which clearly anticipated there would be lots of sequels to come (I don’t think so, somehow).  As I left the movie theatre feeling a bit unfulfilled I tried to pinpoint what I didn’t like about it.  After some discussion with Abu Yasmin, we hit on its polytheism.

In his excellent book Why Religion Matters, Huston Smith outlines a spiritual hierarchy using the analogy of one-way mirrors.  At the bottom is materialistic atheism, which sees material existence but nothing more. The next level is polytheism, which can look through the mirror and see the world of the materialist atheist but adds to it the capricious world of demons, sprites, angels, gods and every kind of superstition.  Nevertheless polytheists see no further.  The third level, which can see down into the other worlds is monotheism in which it is possible to understand God as a benevolent Creator, but goes no further.  Lastly, the top level is that of mysticism which can see down into the other levels, but experiences the immanence and transcendence of the Divine Reality. 

Smith argues that this spiritual hierarchy is found in any religion or ideology, and even though the author of the Golden Compass is apparently an atheist, the movie came across as very polytheistic. There was no ultimate Goodness that exists despite the evil inclinations of some (such as exists in Star Wars, which admittedly is more dualistic than it is monotheistic - maybe Smith needs another level between polytheism and monotheism).

Lyra irritated me too.  She seemed a bit rude and bratty for a child, even if she was the ‘chosen one’ of sorts.  You’d never get Harry Potter being as snarky as she came across.  (Lovely actress though, who did a brilliant job!)

Maybe the book is better, I am not sure.

Tags:

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

5 Responses to “Golden Compass review”

  1. Asalaamu alaikum.

    I big part of what church groups have against it (and I actually personally agree with them) is that the author has stated clearly that he is an atheist and wrote the series in an attempt to discredit religion (not just the church - though that is a big part of it, but all belief in God) in hopes that it would inspire children to become atheists as well. Personally, I figure that children can watch it and if it’s discussed well with parents, it need not have that effect necessarily, but I didn’t let my son see it because I simply don’t care to line the pockets of this author and this ideal of his. I’m all for my son being aware of alternate beliefs and choosing what is right not by default but because it is right. But I’m not for supporting things that I find to be intentionally offensive. Too bad though, because I am rather fond of Nicole. :)

  2. Sorry for the bad typing there… it should say “A big part…”. Wow, that is some too much ego, even subconciously coming out, LOL.

  3. I liked it as a general movie, but it is no lord of the rings or harry potter for sure. We saw it in avoca of all places! :D I didn’t like the lead character - she sounded so annoyingly bratty and had a terrible accent (according to my ears). Won’t be seeing the sequel if any is made.

  4. I’ve only read the reviews of Golden Compass but I’ve thought about the reported beliefs of Philip Pullman — the author of the book from which the movie was lifted. It seems to me that he doesn’t believe in the same God/religion/leadership that I don’t believe in. As for what the movie portrays, I’ll be watching that with interest. I’m curious now about how I’ll react to what you perceive as polytheism. I come from a country with an indigenous polytheism that I admire. This may soften my perception of the daemons and the multitude of spirits inhabiting Pullman’s alternate Earth.

  5. U*m*m Y*a*s*m*i*n Says:

    Hi Steve,

    Smith’s hierarchy is quite subtle - his definition of polytheism isn’t just belief in more than one god/ess for example in Hinduism which has an ultimate Reality that is manifested through gods and goddesses - Smith’s polytheism (and the type I saw in the Golden Compass) is the capricious and superstitious belief of supernatural powers that human beings must placate.

    For example, this type of Christianity would be polytheistic in Huston Smith’s schema. It’s worth reading the book as it also goes into the interplay between traditionalism, modernism and post-modernism and the role that religion plays.

Leave a Reply